Class PR
Connects law firms and litigation funders to the public. We optimise engagement by tailoring all communication to the target audience, facilitating effective communication between law firms, litigation funders and the public.
Class PR
Connects law firms and litigation funders to the public. We optimise engagement by tailoring all communication to the target audience, facilitating effective communication between law firms, litigation funders and the public.
About US
Conflicts Statement
Each client relationship with Class PR is individual and confidential, as between Class PR and the client. We will provide our clients, at our own expense, with a Confidentiality (Non-Disclosure) and Non-Circumvention Agreement, upon your electing to engage us, to protect your confidential IP and business secrets.
Claimants
Class actions & general disputes
If you have a civil or commercial dispute we may be able to refer you to a suitable solicitor and/or to a litigation funder as required.
Claimants
Class actions & general disputes
If you have a civil or commercial dispute we may be able to refer you to a suitable solicitor and/or to a litigation funder as required.
Law Firms
We assist and facilitate with book building to
help you get signups en-masse.
Law Firms
We assist and facilitate with book building to
help you get signups en-masse.
Litigation Funders
We gauge the viability of action, increase traffic of signups and
source new opportunity for funding.
Litigation Funders
We gauge the viability of action, increase traffic of signups and source new opportunity for funding.
Litigation Funders
Class Action Reform
In May 2020 the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services launched an inquiry into Litigation funding and the regulation of the class action industry.
We gauge the viability of action, increase traffic of signups and source new opportunity for funding.
Litigation Funders
Class Action Reform
In May 2020 the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services launched an inquiry into Litigation funding and the regulation of the class action industry.
We gauge the viability of action, increase traffic of signups and source new opportunity for funding.
The economics of class actions: ‘book building’, free riders, common fund orders and funding equalisation orders.
-
Money Max, 2016 – The Common Fund Order is born
The decision of Money Max Int Pty Ltd (Trustee) v QBE Insurance Group Limited (2016) meant that Common Fund Orders (CFOs) could be made at the beginning of proceedings under Federal Court of Australia Act (s 33ZF) and its State-based equivalents.
Common fund orders were a way for courts to ensure economic viability of class action lawsuits and require all group members to contribute to the litigation funder a percentage of their entitlement under any settlement or judgment, whether or not the group member had entered into a funding agreement with the funder.
-
Brewster, 2019 – The death of the Common Fund Order?
The High Court in Australia BMW Australia Ltd v Brewster; Westpac Banking Corporation v Lenthall [2019] HCA 45, 2019, held that common fund orders are not permissible under s 33ZF of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) (“FCA Act”) or its New South Wales equivalent, s 183 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) (“CP Act”).
Consequently, absent any statutory intervention, common fund orders of this kind will no longer feature in the Australian class action landscape.
-
Consequences of Brewster, a return to a 2016, pre-Money Max environment.
Bookbuilding is back.
Bookbuilding is the practice of seeking to sign individual funding agreements with as many group members as possible (a process known as “book-building”). Group members are asked to sign a funding agreement which lists the percentage commission payable to the funder if the action succeeds.
Sufficient group participation is necessary to ensure economic viability of litigation funding as an investment proposition.
The economics of class actions: ‘book building’, free riders, common fund orders and funding equalisation orders.
-
Money Max, 2016 – The Common Fund Order is born
The decision of Money Max Int Pty Ltd (Trustee) v QBE Insurance Group Limited (2016) meant that Common Fund Orders (CFOs) could be made at the beginning of proceedings under Federal Court of Australia Act (s 33ZF) and its State-based equivalents.
Common fund orders were a way for courts to ensure economic viability of class action lawsuits and require all group members to contribute to the litigation funder a percentage of their entitlement under any settlement or judgment, whether or not the group member had entered into a funding agreement with the funder.
-
Brewster, 2019 – The death of the Common Fund Order?
The High Court in Australia BMW Australia Ltd v Brewster; Westpac Banking Corporation v Lenthall [2019] HCA 45, 2019, held that common fund orders are not permissible under s 33ZF of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) (“FCA Act”) or its New South Wales equivalent, s 183 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) (“CP Act”).
Consequently, absent any statutory intervention, common fund orders of this kind will no longer feature in the Australian class action landscape.
-
Consequences of Brewster, a return to a 2016, pre-Money Max environment.
Bookbuilding is back.
Bookbuilding is the practice of seeking to sign individual funding agreements with as many group members as possible (a process known as “book-building”). Group members are asked to sign a funding agreement which lists the percentage commission payable to the funder if the action succeeds.
Sufficient group participation is necessary to ensure economic viability of litigation funding as an investment proposition.
Retain Class PR if you are a litigation funder
looking to:
Retain Class PR if you are a litigation funder looking to:
THE CLASS PR DIFFERENCE
When you engage Class PR, we can guarantee the following:
Professionalism is Paramount
Each Senior Account Manager comes from a Legal or Agency background (or both) and has an established network of media contacts.
Streamlined Customer Management
Centralised regular updates reduce the demand for in-house follow-ups; engender a sense of community amongst the group; and ensure that all court-ordered deadlines are met.
This allows for scalable client acquisition, onboarding, management and retention.
Smart Marketing
An empirical approach to marketing – statistical analysis of target audience’s online and offline behaviour to maximise ROI.
As external consultants, Class PR can bring a level of objectivity difficult to achieve in-house. Our fresh perspective and specialist insights deliver results.
Creative Campaign Strategies
We develop extensive and tailored campaign strategies that ensure we convey our client’s key messages, increase visibility and drive prospective clients, through various nuances in both traditional and non-traditional media platforms.
Digital Marketing – SEO & Social Media
Statistical analysis informs the selection of appropriate platforms.
Engagement is an iterative process – we make sure that your target audience sees the content you want them to see across all mediums.
Tailored Communication is Effective Communication
Each campaign is tailored to your business’ specific goals and target audience.
We undertake empirical analysis of:
This ensures optimal engagement and strong ROI on ad spend and traditional PR (ad value equivalency).
THE CLASS PR DIFFERENCE
When you engage Class PR, we can guarantee the following:
Professionalism is Paramount
Each Senior Account Manager comes from a Legal or Agency background (or both) and has an established network of media contacts.
Streamlined Customer Management
Centralised regular updates reduce the demand for in-house follow-ups; engender a sense of community amongst the group; and ensure that all court-ordered deadlines are met.
This allows for scalable client acquisition, onboarding, management and retention.
Smart Marketing
An empirical approach to marketing – statistical analysis of target audience’s online and offline behaviour to maximise ROI.
As external consultants, Class PR can bring a level of objectivity difficult to achieve in-house. Our fresh perspective and specialist insights deliver results.
Creative Campaign Strategies
We develop extensive and tailored campaign strategies that ensure we convey our client’s key messages, increase visibility and drive prospective clients, through various nuances in both traditional and non-traditional media platforms.
Digital Marketing – SEO & Social Media
Statistical analysis informs the selection of appropriate platforms.
Engagement is an iterative process – we make sure that your target audience sees the content you want them to see across all mediums.
Tailored Communication is Effective Communication
Each campaign is tailored to your business’ specific goals and target audience.
We undertake empirical analysis of:
This ensures optimal engagement and strong ROI on ad spend and traditional PR (ad value equivalency).
Class PR Current Actions
If your are a claimant, to find out more about the Class Actions Class PR are working on, please see below.
7-Eleven
If you are, or were, a 7-Eleven Franchise owner – NOW is the time to take control!
The action is fully funded by a third party litigation funder.
Priceline
Do not put Priceline’s interests before your own – sign a funding agreement to participate.
Aveo
If you believe the “Aveo Way” is the wrong way, it is still not too late to sign a funding agreement with Levitt Robinson opt-out Class Action pending in the Federal Court of Australia in Melbourne.
Metricon
We are aware of a number of common customer complaints. A class action against Metricon would be run on a “No win, no fee” basis.
Australian Defence Force
Have you waited, or are you still waiting, longer than advised for a security clearance from the Australian Government Security Vetting Agency (AGSVA)?
Sensis
If you’ve advertised with Sensis/Yellow Pages & are unhappy with the results, Class PR can get you out of your contract for free.
Class PR Current Actions
If your are a claimant, to find out more about the Class Actions Class PR are working on, please see below.
7-Eleven
If you are, or were, a 7-Eleven Franchise owner – NOW is the time to take control!
The action is fully funded by a third party litigation funder.
Priceline
Do not put Priceline’s interests before your own – sign a funding agreement to participate.
Aveo
If you believe the “Aveo Way” is the wrong way, it is still not too late to sign a funding agreement with Levitt Robinson opt-out Class Action pending in the Federal Court of Australia in Melbourne.
Metricon
We are aware of a number of common customer complaints. A class action against Metricon would be run on a “No win, no fee” basis.
Australian Defence Force
Have you waited, or are you still waiting, longer than advised for a security clearance from the Australian Government Security Vetting Agency (AGSVA)?
Sensis
If you’ve advertised with Sensis/Yellow Pages & are unhappy with the results, Class PR can get you out of your contract for free.
FOLLOW US ON INSTAGRAM
Be the first to know about updates and more important information!
CONTACT US
Register your information with Class PR for a free consultation about your potential claim
THE PROCESS
-
Register your interest with the online claim assessment form or expression of interest
-
We arrange a time for your free consultation to discuss your options
-
We connect you with either the law firm, the funder or the claimants
-
We get to work!
CONTACT US
Register your information with Class PR for a free consultation about your potential claim.