He informed the inquest he had engaged in discussions about this matter with staff but did not remember it being presented as a “major” concern.
During cross-examination by State Solicitor David Leigh on Tuesday, Mr Coyne reiterated that staff had not communicated to him that it was a problem.
“That is an extraordinary oversight,” Coroner Urquhart said, the ABC reports.
“I would suggest to you squarely that they did … and it was an ongoing problem. I’m struggling to understand how … [you] would not be aware of this.”
After a tense interrogation by Counsel Assisting the Coroner, Anthony Crocker, Mr Coyne acknowledged that the statement and evidence he submitted to the CCC were inaccurate.
Mr Crocker asked Mr Coyne: “Does that mean what you told to the CCC was not true?”
Mr Coyne replied: “In hindsight, yes.”
When questioned about his decision to endorse an official statement that conveyed misleading impressions, Mr Coyne said “I shouldn’t have signed it”.
“I was under a lot of pressure, under a lot of stress,” he said.
Frontline staff at Unit 18 informed the CCC inquiry and the first part of the coronial inquest that numerous detainees frequently covered their cell cameras, making it difficult to observe them, despite the continuous monitoring due to their propensity for self-harm.
On Tuesday, Mr Crocker suggested to Mr Coyne that when he provided testimony at the CCC, he was unaware of the evidence presented by other staff members and youth custodial officers.
“But when you heard them give evidence [at the first part of the coronial inquest] you realised the story you told the CCC would not withstand the scrutiny in the inquest?” Said Mr Crocker.
“Yes,” said Mr Coyne.
Mr Crocker continued, telling Mr Coyne: “You knew it would be an impossible sell to maintain that story?”
“Yes,” said Mr Coyne.